
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial 4.0.
Aquellos autores/as que tengan publicaciones con esta revista, aceptan los términos siguientes:
- Los autores/as conservarán sus derechos de autor y garantizarán a la revista el derecho de primera publicación de su obra, el cuál estará simultáneamente sujeto a la Licencia de reconocimiento no comercial de Creative Commons que permite a terceros compartir la obra siempre que se indique su autor y su primera publicación esta revista.
- Los autores/as podrán adoptar otros acuerdos de licencia no exclusiva de distribución de la versión de la obra publicada (p. ej.: depositarla en un archivo telemático institucional o publicarla en un volumen monográfico) siempre que se indique la publicación inicial en esta revista.
- Se permite y recomienda a los autores/as difundir su obra a través de Internet (p. ej.: en archivos telemáticos institucionales o en su página web) antes y durante el proceso de envío, lo cual puede producir intercambios interesantes y aumentar las citas de la obra publicada. (Véase El efecto del acceso abierto).
Resumen
Este artículo examina la compleja interacción entre las estrategias antiterroristas y los derechos fundamentales a un juicio justo. Aborda la cuestión de si los regímenes jurídicos utilizados para combatir el terrorismo vulneran derechos humanos básicos. El estudio analiza los efectos de las leyes antiterroristas sobre los derechos procesales, incluida la independencia del poder judicial, la imparcialidad y el derecho a la defensa. Mediante un enfoque de análisis comparativo, el documento se centra en sistemas jurídicos en los que se han identificado derogaciones relacionadas con violaciones de los derechos procesales, y destaca cuestiones vinculadas con los tribunales especiales, las leyes de emergencia y diversas medidas de seguridad. De este modo, el estudio ofrece una perspectiva crítica de las deficiencias estructurales, basándose en jurisdicciones seleccionadas según sus marcos antiterroristas pertinentes, y no por su ubicación geográfica o similitudes jurídicas.
Los resultados revelan una tendencia alarmante: en un número significativo de jurisdicciones, las leyes antiterroristas entran en contradicción con las normas de derechos humanos generalmente aceptadas, lo que obstaculiza las garantías procesales bajo el pretexto de la seguridad nacional. El aplazamiento del acceso a los servicios jurídicos, los juicios a puerta cerrada, la utilización de tribunales especiales y la dependencia de instrumentos legales promulgados durante estados de emergencia resultan contrarios al espíritu de un poder judicial abierto e imparcial. En consecuencia, estas prácticas suscitan serias preocupaciones respecto de si las necesidades de seguridad deben prevalecer sobre los derechos humanos fundamentales.
La investigación concluye que, si bien no existe duda sobre la necesidad de combatir el terrorismo, las medidas preventivas deben ser objeto de un estricto control y sustentarse en sólidas garantías procesales. La autonomía de los tribunales ordinarios, la transparencia del proceso judicial y el fortalecimiento de los mecanismos de supervisión internacional constituyen pilares esenciales para garantizar un equilibrio adecuado entre la justicia y la seguridad.
Citas
Abad Jara, Sebastian, and Daniel Pereira Campos. "Military Courts and Human Rights Violations in Brazil: From the Perspective of the Inter-American Human Rights System." EJIL: Talk, 15 September 2022. Available at: https://www.ejiltalk.org/military-courts-and-human-rights-violations-in-brazil-from-the-perspective-of-the-inter-american-human-rights-system
(accessed on 29 November 2024).
African Commission on Human Rights. Legal Defence and Assistance Project v. Nigeria, Communication No. 218/98, 6 March 2000.
Ahmed, Dawood, and Elliot Bulmer. "Limitation Clauses." International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance. Available at: https://www.idea.int/sites/default/files/publications/limitation-clauses-primer.pdf
(accessed on 21 December 2024).
Alkarama Foundation. "Saudi Arabia's New Anti-Terrorism Law Makes the Same Mistakes as Its Predecessor by Abusing Human Rights." Available at: https://www.alkarama.org/en/articles/saudi-arabias-new-anti-terrorism-law-makes-same-mistakes-its-predecessor-abusing(accessed on 30 November 2024).
Atkins, Benjamin, and Nathan Moran. "Contemporary International and Domestic Terrorist and Security Threats." In Special Topics in Policing, edited by James F. Albrecht and Geert den Heyer. Cham: Springer, 2024. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-67943-8_1 (accessed on 15 November 2024).
Atwan, Abdel Bari. L'histoire secrète d'Al-Qaïda: les origines, les réseaux, la stratégie. Paris, 2007.
Blair, Rachel. "Military Justice in Chile: Exploring Its Ongoing Violation of the American Convention on Human Rights." Jackson School Journal of International Studies, Spring/Summer 2023.
Casciani, Dominic. "Fully Secret Terror Trial Blocked by Court of Appeal." BBC News, 12 June 2014. Available at: https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-27806814(accessed on 25 December 2024).
Castañeda García, Ivette. "Military Justice in Latin America: A Comparative Analysis." In Military Justice in the Modern Age, edited by Alison Duxbury and Matthew Groves. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 5 July 2016. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107326330.011 (accessed on 7 December 2024).
Council of Europe: Commissioner for Human Rights. "Report by Thomas Hammarberg, Commissioner for Human Rights of the Council of Europe, Following His Visit to Turkey from 10 to 14 October 2011: Administration of Justice and Protection of Human Rights in Turkey." 10 January 2012, CommDH (2012)2. Available at: http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12389/21220 (accessed on 27 December 2024).
Deharo, Gaëlle. "Restriction du droit d'accès à un avocat." La lettre juridique, 29 September 2016. Available at: https://www.lexbase.fr/article-juridique/34599451-jurisprudence-restriction-du-droit-d-acces-a-un-avocat (accessed on 4 December 2024).
Desprez, François. "Conformité à la Constitution du Report de l'Intervention de l'Avocat au Cours de la Garde à Vue pour Criminalité Organisée." La Revue des Droits de l'Homme, 23 December 2014. Available at: https://doi.org/10.4000/revdh.1035 (accessed on 26 November 2024).
Dyson, Matthew, and Lorna Woods. Criminal Records, Privacy and the Criminal Justice System. Bloomsbury Professional, 12 September 2019.
England and Wales Court of Appeal (Criminal Division). Guardian News & Media Ltd v. Incedal, EWCA Crim 1861, 24 September 2014.
European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR). Campbell and Fell v. United Kingdom, Application Nos. 7819/77 and 7878/77, 28 June 1984. Available at: https://hudoc.echr.coe.int
(accessed on 26 December 2024).
European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR). Heaney and McGuiness v. Ireland, Application no. 34720/97, 21 December 2000.
European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR). Helmers v. Sweden, serie A no. 212-A, 29 October 1991.
European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR). Murray v. United Kingdom, Judgment of 8 February 1996, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1996-I.
European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR). Öcalan v. Turkey, Application no. 46221/99, 12 May 2005.
European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR). Werner v. Austria, Rec. 1997-VII, 24 November 1997.
Fatile, Jacob O., and Ganiyu L. Ejalonibu. "Global Terrorism Networks and Boko Haram Insurgency in Nigeria." In Managing Contemporary Security Challenges in Nigeria. Africa's Global Engagement: Perspectives from Emerging Countries, edited by A. A. Abdullahi et al. Singapore: Palgrave Macmillan, 2024. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-97-5296-6_10
(accessed on 26 December 2024).
FIDH. "Arbitrary Drifts in the Fight against Terrorism in Morocco." 7 July 2003. Available at: https://www.fidh.org/en/region/north-africa-middle-east/morocco/Arbitrary-drifts-in-the-fight
(accessed on 26 November 2024).
Fragnon, Julien. La gestion politique du 11 septembre en France. Ph.D. thesis in Political Sciences, Lyon University, 2009.
French Business Law. "Article 306 of the French Code of Criminal Procedure." 3 November 2023. Available at: https://french-business-law.com/french-legislation-art/article-306-of-the-french-code-of-criminal-procedure/ (accessed on 21 December 2024).
French Business Law. "Article 706-73 of the French Code of Criminal Procedure." Available at: https://french-business-law.com/french-legislation-art/article-706-73-of-the-french-code-of-criminal-procedure/ (accessed on 23 December 2024).
French Business Law. "Article 706-88 of the French Code of Criminal Procedure." Available at: https://french-business-law.com/french-legislation-art/article-706-88-of-the-french-code-of-criminal-procedure/ (accessed on 24 November 2024).
Gaucher, Alexis. "Pourquoi Certains Procès Se Déroulent à Huis Clos." L'Yonne Républicaine, 21 October 2024. Available at: https://www.lyonne.fr/auxerre-89000/actualites/pourquoi-certains-proces-se-deroulent-a-huis-clos_14583428/ (accessed on 22 December 2024).
Guillaume, Gilbert. "Terrorisme et Droit international." In RCADI, 1989.
High Court of Justice (England and Wales). R v Sussex Justices; Ex parte McCarthy, 1924, 1 KB 256.
Human Rights Watch. "'You Say You Want a Lawyer': Tunisia's New Law on Detention in Paper and Practice." 1 June 2018. Available at: https://www.hrw.org/report/2018/06/01/you-say-you-want-lawyer/tunisias-new-law-detention-paper-and-practice
(accessed on 3 December 2024).
Human Rights Watch. "Egypt: Counterterrorism Law Erodes Basic Rights." 19 August 2015. Available at: https://www.hrw.org/news/2015/08/19/egypt-counterterrorism-law-erodes-basic-rights (accessed on 28 December 2024).
Human Rights Watch. "Egypt: Unprecedented Expansion of Military Courts." 17 November 2017. Available at: https://www.hrw.org/news/2014/11/17/egypt-unprecedented-expansion-military-courts (accessed on 27 December 2024).
Human Rights Watch. "Peru: Egregious Abuses by Security Forces." 26 April 2023. Available at: https://www.hrw.org/news/2023/04/26/peru-egregious-abuses-security-forces (accessed on 29 November 2024).
Human Rights Watch. "Preempting Justice: Counterterrorism Laws and Procedures in France." 1 July 2008. Available at: https://www.hrw.org/report/2008/07/01/preempting-justice/counterterrorism-laws-and-procedures-france (accessed on 25 November 2024).
Human Rights Watch. "Report on Human Rights in Yemen: Submitted by Human Rights Watch to the UN Human Rights Committee on the Occasion of its Review of Yemen in March 2012." February 2012. Available at: http://www2.ohchr.org/english/bodies/hrc/docs/ngos/HRW_Yemen_HRC104.pdf (accessed on 4 January 2025).
Human Rights Watch. "Saudi Arabia: New Counterterrorism Law Enables Abuse." 23 November 2017. Available at: https://www.hrw.org/news/2017/11/23/saudi-arabia-new-counterterrorism-law-enables-abuse (accessed on 30 November 2024).
Human Rights Watch. "Tunisia: Landmark Step for Detainee Rights." 4 February 2016. Available at: https://www.hrw.org/news/2016/02/04/tunisia-landmark-step-detainee-rights (accessed on 30 November 2024).
Human Rights Watch. "Turkey: State of Emergency Provisions Violate Human Rights and Should Be Revoked." 20 October 2016. Available at: https://www.hrw.org/news/2016/10/20/turkey-state-emergency-provisions-violate-human-rights-and-should-be-revoked
(accessed on 18 November 2024).
Human Rights Watch. "U.S. Military Commission Trials for 9/11 Suspects a Blow to Justice." News Release, 4 April 2015. Available at: http://www.hrw.org/news/2011/04/04/us-military-commission-trials-911-suspects-blow-justice
(accessed on 28 December 2024).
Inter-American Court of Human Rights (IACtHR). Castillo Petruzzi and Others v. Peru, 30 May 1999.
Inter-American Court of Human Rights (IACtHR). Durand Ugarte v. Peru, 16 August 2000.
Inter-American Court of Human Rights (IACtHR). Herzog and Others v. Brazil, 4 July 2018.
International Commission of Jurists. "Egypt Constitutional Amendments: Unaccountable Military, Unchecked President and a Subordinated Judiciary." April 2019. Available at: https://www.icj.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/04/Egypt-Constitutional-amendments-advocacy-analysis-brief-2019-ENG.pdf (accessed on 28 December 2024).
Kagan, Donald, Steven Ozment, Frank M. Turner, and Gregory Francis Viggiano. The Western Heritage. 11th ed. Pearson, 2012.
Knoechelmann, Maike. "Why the Nigerian Counter-Terrorism Policy Toward Boko Haram Has Failed: A Cause and Effect Relationship." In The International Institute for Counter-Terrorism (ICT) Working Papers Series 32, October 2014. Available at: http://www.jstor.org/stable/resrep09448 (accessed on 27 December 2024).
Lawless, Jill. "UK Court Says Terror Trial Can Be Partly Secret." Washington Examiner, 20 February 2016. Available at: https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/2342896/uk-court-says-terror-trial-can-be-partly-secret (accessed on 24 December 2024).
Lysaght, Charles. "Publicity of Court Proceedings." Irish Jurist 38 (2003). JSTOR. Available at: https://www.jstor.org/stable/43951793
(accessed on 5 December 2024).
Maniszewska, Katarzyna. "Countering Terrorism: Key Challenges and Proposed Solutions." In Towards a New Definition of Terrorism, Contributions to Security and Defence Studies. Cham: Springer, 2024. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-58719-1_4
(accessed on 2 January 2025).
Mastor, Wanda. "L'état d'exception aux États-Unis: le USA Patriot Act et autres violations «en règle» de la constitution." In AIJC, no. XXIV, 2008.
McCall-Smith, Kasey. "How Torture and National Security Have Corrupted the Right to Fair Trial in the 9/11 Military Commissions." Journal of Conflict and Security Law 27, no. 1 (2022). Available at: https://doi.org/10.1093/jcsl/krac002 (accessed on 22 November 2024).
Momsen, Carsten, and Marco Willumat. "Due Process and Fair Trial." In Elgar Encyclopedia of Crime and Criminal Justice, 28 November 2024. Available at: https://doi.org/10.4337/9781789902990.due.process.fair.trial (accessed on 17 November 2024).
Montesquieu, Charles Louis de Secondat, Baron de La Brède et de. The Spirit of Laws, Book XI. London: Printed for J. Collingwood, 1823.
Oderkerk, Marieke. "The Importance of Context: Selecting Legal Systems in Comparative Legal Research." Netherlands International Law Review 48, no. 3 (2001). Available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0165070X00001340 (accessed on 19 November 2024).
Okacha, Chuks, and Michael Olugbode. "FG to Amend Anti-Terrorism Act." Thisday, 6 May 2012. Available at: https://oladapokolawole.com/2012/05/06/nigeria-fg-to-amend-anti-terrorism-act/ (accessed on 18 December 2024).
Parker, Tom. Avoiding the Terrorist Trap: Why Respect for Human Rights Is the Key to Defeating Terrorism. Insurgency and Terrorism Series, Potomac Books, 2019.
Parliament of Australia. Australia's Criminal Code of 1995 as Amended by Act No. 13, 2021. Available at: http://www.comlaw.gov.au/Details/C2012C00451 (accessed on 22 November 2024).
Parliament of Egypt. Constitution of the Arab Republic of Egypt of 2015 as amended in 2019, art. 204. Available at: https://faolex.fao.org/docs/pdf/egy127542e.pdf (accessed on 24 December 2024).
Parliament of Republic of Türkiye. Türkiye's Law on Fight against Terrorism, No. 3713 of 1991.
Parliament of United Kingdom. UK Terrorism Act, 2000, as amended by the Terrorism Act 2006. Available at: http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2000/11 (accessed on 5 December 2024).
Pauwels, Anne. "EU Counterterrorism Cooperation with the MENA: Optimal or Suboptimal?" In Transnational Security Cooperation in the Mediterranean, edited by Robert Mason. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, 2021. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-54444-7_4
(accessed on 1 January 2025).
Paye, Jean Clause. "Le «Patriot Act Reauthorization»: Un État d'Urgence Permanent." Multitudes.net. Available at: https://www.multitudes.net/Le-Patriot-Act-Reauthorization-un/ (accessed on 22 December 2024).
Roth, Kenneth. "Justice Cheater." The International Herald Tribune, 6 May 2012. Available at: http://www.hrw.org/news/2012/05/06/justice-cheated (accessed on 28 December 2024).
Satan, Ali. Les dispositifs juridiques de lutte contre le terrorisme et les garanties des droits fondamentaux, le cas de la France et des pays du Golfe. Ph.D Thesis in Public Law, Sorbonne University, 2019.
Seventh United Nations Congress on the Prevention of Crime and the Treatment of Offenders. "Basic Principles on the Independence of the Judiciary." 6 September 1985. Available at: https://www.ohchr.org/en/instruments-mechanisms/instruments/basic-principles-independence-judiciary (accessed on 26 December 2024).
Sherman, Jake, and Agathe Sarfati. "Reflecting on the UN's Role in Counterterrorism Twenty Years After 9/11." IPI Global Observatory, 8 June 2021. Available at: https://theglobalobservatory.org/2021/06/reflecting-on-the-uns-role-in-counterterrorism-twenty-years-after (accessed on 1 January 2025).
Simoncini, Gabriele. "The Price to Be Paid: The Impacts of Counterterrorism on a New Democratic Polity." In Counterterrorism in Transition: Post-2011 Tunisian Democracy and the War on Terror. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, 2024. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-54184-1_5 (accessed on 3 December 2024).
Steyn, Johan. "Guantanamo Bay: The Legal Black Hole." The International and Comparative Law Quarterly 53, no. 1 (2004).
The United Nations Human Rights Committee. "Concluding Observations of the Human Rights Committee for the United Kingdom," 93rd Session, Geneva, 7–25 July 2008, UN Doc. ICCPR/C/GBR/CO/6, 30 July 2008. Available at: www.icj.org/IMG/CO_UK.pdf
(accessed on 5 December 2024).
Tuomioistuimet.fi. "Publicity in General Courts." Available at: https://tuomioistuimet.fi/en/index/asiointijajulkisuus/oikeudenkaynninjulkisuus/publicityingeneralcourts.html (accessed on 20 December 2024).
UN General Assembly. "Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms While Countering Terrorism: Note / by the Secretary-General, Martin Scheinin." 6 August 2008 (A/63/223). Available at: https://www.refworld.org/docid/48dce8222.html (accessed on 20 December 2024).
UN Human Rights Council. "Report of the Special Rapporteur on the Independence of Judges and Lawyers on Her Mission to Sri Lanka," A/HRC/35/31/Add.1, 23 March 2017. Available at: https://www.refworld.org/reference/mission/unhrc/2017/en/116933
(accessed on 24 December 2024).
UN Human Rights Council. "Report of the Sub-Commission Special Rapporteur on Terrorism and Human Rights: Specific Human Rights Issues: New Priorities, in Particular Terrorism and Counter-Terrorism, Kalliopi K. Koufa." 3 August 2006 (A/HRC/Sub.1/58/30). Available at: https://undocs.org/A/HRC/Sub.1/58/30 (accessed on 20 November 2024).
United Nations Commission on Human Rights. "Report of the Working Group on Arbitrary Detention," UN Doc. E/CN.4/1996/40, 15 December 1995. Available at: https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/228235/files/E_CN.4_1996_40-EN.pdf (accessed on 25 December 2024).
United Nations Human Rights Committee. "General Comment No. 32: Article 14, Right to Equality before Courts and Tribunals and to a Fair Trial," CCPR/C/GC/32, 23 August 2007. Available at: https://www.refworld.org/legal/general/hrc/2007/en/52583 (accessed on 21 December 2024).
United Nations Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR). "About Protecting Human Rights While Countering Terrorism and Preventing Violent Extremism." Available at: https://www.ohchr.org/en/terrorism/about-protecting-human-rights-while-countering-terrorism-and-preventing-violent-extremism (accessed on 1 January 2025).
United Nations Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR). "Rampant Abuse of Counter-Terrorism Laws Threaten Human Rights Globally, Warns UN Expert." March 2024. Available at: https://www.ohchr.org/en/press-releases/2024/03/rampant-abuse-counter-terrorism-laws-threaten-human-rights-globally-warns-un (accessed on 3 January 2025).
United Nations Rule of Law. "Qatar: Promotion and Protection of Human Rights." Available at: https://www.un.org/ruleoflaw/blog/portfolio-items/qatar-promotion-and-protection-of-human-rights/ (accessed on 24 December 2024).
USA Secretary of Defense. "US Manual For Military Commissions." 2010. Available at: https://www.mc.mil/portals/0/2010_manual_for_military_commissions.pdf (accessed on 22 December 2024).
Vagts, Detlev F. "Which Courts Should Try Persons Accused of Terrorism?" European Journal of International Law 14, no. 2 (2003): 313–326. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1093/ejil/14.2.313 (accessed on 9 December 2024).
Van Hoecke, Mark. "Methodology of Comparative Legal Research." Law and Method, June 2015. Available at: https://doi.org/10.5553/REM/.000010 (accessed on 19 November 2024).
Weiss, Michael, and Hassan Hassan. ISIS: Inside the Army of Terror. 2nd ed. Regan Arts, 2016.
Wellman, Carl. Terrorism and Counterterrorism 9. Springer in Law. Dordrecht: Springer, 2013. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6007-3_1 (accessed on 16 November 2024).




