PDF (Español (España))
FLIP
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
Abstract
This paper deals with the basic essentials of legal evidence from the perspective of legal realism factor. It underlines the paramount need for a substrate ontological, logical and methodological substantial, objective meaning of legal evidence. At the same time, which makes manifest the antinomies caused by constructivist evidentiary and procedural systems to the science of law and at the same epistemological status of legal evidence. What has led to an oversight, consciously or unconsciously, the ultimate goal of the task of law: the act of justice.
Keywords:
References
AA. VV. Justicia y sistema político. Bogotá: Instituto de Estudios Políticos y Relaciones Internacionales, IEPRI/Universidad Nacional de Colombia, 1997.
ARISTÓTELES. Tratados de Lógica (Órganon), I. Madrid: Gredos, 1982.
CARNELUTTI, Francesco. La prueba civil. Buenos Aires: Arayú, 1955.
CORTE SUPREMA DE JUSTICIA. SS-029 de 2008. M. P.: Vargas, William Namén. Bogotá, D. C., treinta (30) de abril de dos mil ocho (2008). (Aprobada por Acta No. 16 de 4 de marzo de 2008). Referencia: expediente No. 68001-3110-004-2003-00666-01.
DEVIS ECHANDÍA, Hernando. Teoría general de la prueba judicial, quinta edición. Bogotá: Temis, 2002.
GASCÓN ABELLÁN, Marina. “Los hechos en el derecho”, en Seminario “Los hechos en el derecho. Bases argumentales de la prueba”. México: Escuela Judicial Electoral del Tribunal Electoral del Poder Judicial de la Federación, p. 4, 2003.
GONZÁLEZ CASTRO, Manuel. “Principios y reglas que rigen la actividad probatoria”, 2008. Disponible en: https://www.institutoderechoprocesal.org/.pdf.
HERVADA, JAVIER. Lecciones propedéuticas de Filosofía del Derecho, quinta edición. Pamplona: Eunsa, 1995.
– Introducción crítica al Derecho Natural. Bogotá: Temis, 2000.
KAUFMANN, A.; HASSEMER, W. El pensamiento jurídico contemporáneo. Madrid: Debate, 1992.
LESSONA. Teoría general de la prueba en Derecho Civil, t. 1. Madrid: Reus, 1928.
LUHMANN, Niklas. Organización y decisión. Autopoiesis, acción y entendimiento comunicativo. Barcelona: Anthropos, 1997.
MUÑOZ, Jacobo; REGUERA, Isidoro. Introducción al Tratactus Logico-Philosophicus de Ludwig Wittgenstein. Barcelona: Ediciones Altaya, 1994.
PUTNAM, Hilary. El desplome de la dicotomía hecho/valor y otros ensayos. Barcelona: Paidós, 2004.
TEUBNER, Günther. Law as Autopoietic System. London: Blackwells, 1992.
