How to Cite
Hernández Duarte, M. A. (2011). Jurisprudence of the colombian supreme court of justice, penal cassation chamber, on manslaughter (culpable homicide). Novum Jus, 5(1), 117–137. Retrieved from https://novumjus.ucatolica.edu.co/article/view/688
License

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

    1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
    2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
    3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).

Abstract

Jurisprudential line refers to the detailed study on a specific subject, regarded in several of the sentences uttered by the High Courts, whereby any juridical problem is approached and properly solved. As it was stated by Medina in his work Derecho de los Jueces, it can constitute a judicial precedent for the analysis of the same subject. This work is intended to state the juridical problem and the possible solutions proclaimed by the honorable Supreme Court of Justice of Colombia to vehicular manslaughter (U.S. Law) unintentionally caused for negligent driving under the influence of alcohol. Now then, this research points out crucial topics for the jurisprudential analysis like the initial or Archimedean sentence, the milestone sentences (those supporting this work), the considerations made by the Court and the concluding remarks that can be taken from that. As a result, it presents a final-generalized solution to the established juridical problem.

Keywords:

References

BUSTOS RAMÍREZ, Juan. Lecciones de Derecho Penal. Parte General. Colombia. Editorial Trotta. 2006.

CORTE SUPREMADE JUSTICIA. SS-26900 de 2008. M.P. Dr. Javier Zapata Ortiz. Colombia.

CORTE SUPREMA DE JUSTICIA. SS-12029 de 2000. M.P. Dr. Fernando E. Arboleda Ripoll. Colombia.

CORTE SUPREMA DE JUSTICIA. SS-12601 de 2000. M.P. Dr. Fernando E. Arboleda Ripoll. Colombia.

CORTE SUPREMA DE JUSTICIA. SS- 13335 de 2001. M.P. Dr. Carlos Augusto Gálvez Argote. Colombia.

CORTE SUPREMA DE JUSTICIA. SS- 14202 de 2002. M.P. Dr. Carlos Augusto Gálvez Argote. Colombia.

CORTE SUPREMA DE JUSTICIA. SS- 20493 de 2005. M.P. Dr. Álvaro Orlando Pérez. Colombia.

CORTE SUPREMA DE JUSTICIA. SS- 14355 de 2000. M.P. Dr. Jorge Aníbal Gómez Gallego. Colombia.

CORTE SUPREMA DE JUSTICIA. SS- 32964 de 2010. M.P. Dr. José Leónidas Bustos Martínez. Colombia.

LÓPEZ MEDINA, Diego Eduardo. El Derecho de los Jueces. Colombia. Legis, 2007.

Reference by

Sistema OJS 3 - Metabiblioteca |