PDF (Español (España))
FLIP
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
Abstract
The doctrine of positivism in law is predominant in the recent history of legal theory. As much in positive as in negative, almost everything has been said about this theory. Nevertheless, recently, without falling in repetition, irrelevance or pedantry, has appeared a thematic opening in its study. This thematic opening looks to connect the theory of positive legal system with a perspective of law and society. This article is located in such tendency. Thus, orients to a revision of the iuspositivive theory in relation to the bond between this theory and dynamic the factual budgets of the structure and the legal ones of which such theory tries a conceptual description, considering the impact that the social transformations of their factual budgets have had on this theory.
Keywords:
References
aa. vv. (2006). El positivismo jurídico a examen. Estudios en homenaje a José Delgado Pinto. Salamanca: E. U. Salamanca.
Austin, J. (1970). Lectures on jurisprudence, or the philosophy of positive law, vol. 3. New York: B. Franklin.
Austin, J.(2002). El objeto de la jurisprudencia, Juan Ramón de Páramo (trad. y ed.). Madrid: Centro de Estudios Políticos y Constitucionales.
Austin, J. (1981). Sobre la utilidad del estudio de la jurisprudencia, F. González Vicén (trad. e intrd.). Madrid: Centro de Estudios Constitucionales.
Bobbio, N. (1965). El problema del positivismo jurídico, E. Garzón Valdés (trad.). Buenos Aires: eudeba.
Bobbio, N. (1980). Contribución a la Teoría del derecho, A. Ruiz Miguel (ed.). Valencia: F. Torres.
Bobbio, N. (1993). El positivismo jurídico, R. de Asís y A. Greppi (trads.). Madrid: Debate.
Calvo García, M. (1994). Los fundamentos del método jurídico. Una revisión crítica. Madrid: Tecnos.
Calvo García, M. (2000). Teoría del derecho, 2.ª ed., Madrid: Tecnos.
Calvo García, M. (2005). Transformaciones del Estado y del derecho. Bogotá: Externado.
Campbell, T. (1999). Legal positivism. Ashgate: Aldershot.
Campbell, T. (2004). Prescriptive legal positivism: law, rights and democracy. London: UCL.
Campbell, T. (1996). The legal theory of ethical positivism. Aldershot: Dartmouth.
Carbonell, M. y Salazar, P. (eds.) (2005). Garantismo. Estudios sobre el pensamiento jurídico de Luigi Ferrajoli. Madrid: Trotta.
Coleman, J. (ed.) (2001). Hart’s postcript: essays on the postscript of the concept of law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Coterrell, R. (2003). The politics of jurisprudence. A critical introduction to legal philosphy, 2.ª ed., United Kingdom: LexisNexis.
Dworkin, R. (1987). “The theory and the problem of sense”, en Ruth Gavison. Issues in contemporary legal philosophy. The influence of H. L. A. Hart. Oxford: Clarendon.
Ferrajoli, L. (1990). Diritto e ragione. Teoria del garantismo penale, 2.ª ed. Bari: Laterza.
Ferrajoli, L. (2006). Garantismo. Una discusión sobre derecho y democracia. Madrid: Trotta.
Ferrajoli, L. (2002). “Iuspositivismo crítico y democracia constitucional”, Isegoría, 16.
Galligan, D.(1992). Discretionary powers. A legal study of official discretion. Oxford: Clarendon.
Galligan, D. (2007). Law in modern society. Oxford: oup-Clarendon Law Series.
García Pelayo, M. (1968). “La idea medieval del derecho”, en Del mito y de la razón en la historia del pensamiento político. Madrid: Revista de Occidente.
George, R. (ed.) (1996). The autonomy of law: essays on legal Positivism. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Gómez Arboleya, E. (1962). “Supuestos cardinales de la ciencia jurídica moderna”, en Estudios de teoría de la sociedad y del Estado. Madrid: IEP.
Gómez Arboleya, E. (1976). Historia de la estructura y del pensamiento social. Madrid: IEP.
González Vicén, F. (1984). “La escuela histórica del derecho”, en De Kant a Marx (Estudios de historia de las ideas). Valencia: F. Torres.
Hawkins, K. (ed.) (2001). “The use of legal discretion from law and social science”, en The uses of discretion. Oxford: Clarendon.
Hawkins, K. (2002). Law as last resort: prosecution decision-making in a regulatory agency. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hawkins, K. (2003). “Order, rationality and silence: some reflections on criminal justice decision-making”, en L. Gelsthorpe y N. Padfield (eds.). Exercising discretion. Portland: Willan P.
Hart (1994). The concept of law, 2.ª ed. Oxford: OUP.
Hobbes, T. (1980). Leviatán, o la materia, forma y poder de una república eclesiástica y civil, M. Sánchez Sarto (trad.). México: Fondo de Cultura Económica.
Kramer, M. (1999). In defence of legal positivism: law without trimmings. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Maravall, J. (1972). Estado moderno y mentalidad social (siglos XV a XVII), T. II. Madrid: Revista de Occidente.
Perez Luño, A. (1974). “Escuela histórica y derecho natural”, en Revolución, conservadurismo, tradición. Madrid: Speiro.
Prieto Sanchis, L. (1997). Constitucionalismo y positivismo. México: Fontamara.
Rodilla, M. (2002). “Entrevista a Delgado Pinto”, Doxa, 25.
Savigny, F. (1908). “Sobre el fin de la Revista de la Escuela Histórica”, en La Escuela Histórica del Derecho: documentos para su estudio, R. Atard y V. Suárez (trad.). Madrid: Librería General de Victoriano Suárez.
Savigny, F. (1979). “Savigny y la ciencia del derecho”, en A. Squella (ed.). Revista de Ciencias Sociales, 14/I.
Scarpelli, U. (1965). Cos’e’ il positivismo giuridico. Milano: Comunità.
Schauer, F. (1996). “Positivism as Pariah”, en R. P. George, The autonomy of law. Essays on legal positivism. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Schauer, F. (1999). “Positivism through thin and thick”, en T. D. Campbell. Legal positivism. Aldershot: Ashgate.
Sebok, A. (1998). Legal positivism in american jurisprudence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Tamanaha, B. (2001). A general jurisprudence of law and society. Oxford: Oxford University Press, Oxfor Socio-Legal Studies.
Tuori, K. (2002). Critical legal positivism. Aldershot: Ashgate.
Twining, W. (2003). Derecho y globalización, O. Guardiola-Rivera et al. (trad.). Bogotá, Siglo del Hombre.
Weber, M. (1979). Economía y sociedad. Esbozo de sociología comprensiva, J. Winckelmann (ed.). México: Fondo de Cultura Económica.
Zagrebelsky, G. (1995). El derecho dúctil: ley, derechos, justicia, M. Gascón (trad.). Madrid: Trotta.
