How to Cite
Ferrari, V. (2009). Some thesis about laicity. Novum Jus, 3(2), 7–26. Retrieved from https://novumjus.ucatolica.edu.co/article/view/710
License

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

    1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
    2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
    3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).

Abstract

This article says that laicity indicates a condition of the polis, that condition is based on the operational separation between religion, morality and law. That which distinguishes laicity as a model of civic life in a society, is that the separation between the religious, moral and legal is high primary organizing principle, the recognition of a decision-making autonomy “sovereign” civil society, through their representatives. No one should be atheist to accept and support this model of laicity, based on freedom of conscience. Nor does it mean to be agnostic towards the transcendent, cognitive skeptical or indifferent ethics. It just means that every man can admit making an error, without falling into extreme relativism. Thus, laicity is the safeguarding of freedom also for the churches, especially when they are minority

Keywords:

References

Bobbio, N. (1992). L’età dei diritti, Torino, Einaudi.

Cattaneo, M. (2008). Dotta ignoranza e umanesimo cristiano, Napoli, esi.

Jemolo, A. (2003). Cristiano perché relativista, relativista perché cristiano. Per un razionalismo della contingenza, Soveria Mannelli, Rubbettino.

Villa, V. (2007). “Relativismo: un’analisi concettuale”, en Ragion pratica.

Gobetti, P. (1965). La rivoluzione liberale (1924), Torino, Einaudi.

Fornero, G. (1998). “Relativismo”, en Nicola Abbagnano, Dizionario di filosofia, 3.ª ed. actualizada y ampliada por Giovanni Fornero, Torino, Utet.

Treves, R. (1954). Spirito critico e spirito dogmatico, Milano, Nuvoletti.

Scarpelli, U. (1998). Bioetica laica, Milano, Baldini & Castoldi.

Giorello, G. (2005). Di nessuna chiesa. La libertà del laico, Milano, Raffaello Cortina.

Lombardi Vallauri, L. (1996). “La bioetica e il problema dello statuto dell’embrione”, en E. D’Orazio y M. Mori (eds.), Quale base comune per la riflessione bioetica in Italia? Dibattito sul manifesto di bioetica laica, número especial de Notizie di Politei.

Mill, J. (1981). Saggio sulla libertà (1859), S. Magistretti (trad.), Milano, Il Saggiatore.

Marzo, E. (2006). Le voci del padrone. Saggio di liberalismo applicato alla servitù dei media, Bari, Dedalo.

Reference by

Sistema OJS 3 - Metabiblioteca |