PDF (Español (España))
FLIP
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
Abstract
The activity of the Constitutional Court is one source of law necessary to understand the legal practice in Colombia. This activity is a diverse mix of facts, rules and concepts that characterize the judicial law. In this way, changes in the composition of the Constitutional Court should not go unnoticed, especially when in 2010 seven of the nine members of this court will be new. Therefore, in the Faculty of Law, Catholic University of Colombia was developed to describe research relevant jurisprudential elements of sentences of former judges of the Constitutional Court as data necessary to understand the patterns of the “New Court. “ This article presents the findings and perspectives of the work done on the judgments of Humberto Sierra Porto on legislative procedure.
Keywords:
References
AGUILAR, Juan José; MANTILLA, María José; LANCHEROS, Juan Carlos; PULIDO, Fabio. “Síntesis jurisprudenciales”, en Manuales legislativos: síntesis jurisprudenciales. Bogotá: Avance Jurídico/PNUD/IDEA, 2009.
BAUM, Lawrence. La Suprema Corte: función y comportamiento en la sociedad norteamericana. Buenos Aires: Grupo Editor latinoamericano, 1994.
CEPEDA, Manuel José. Derecho constitucional jurisprudencial. Bogotá: Legis, 2001.
KAPISZEWSKI, Diana. “La Corte Suprema y la política constitucional en la Argentina pos Menem”, en Revista jurídica de la Universidad de Palermo, 7(1): 5-46, 2006.
MEINKE, Scott; SCOTT, Kevin. “Collegial Influence and Judicial Voting Change: The Effect of Membership Change on U.S. Supreme Court Justices”, en Law & Society Review, 41(4): 909-938, 2007.
LANCHEROS, Juan Carlos. “Presentación y metodología”, en Manuales legislativos: síntesis jurisprudenciales. Bogotá: Avance jurídico/PNUD/IDEA, 2009.
Palacio Torres, Alfonso. Concepto y control del procedimiento legislativo. Bogotá: Universidad Externado de Colombia.
PULIDO, Fabio. “Elementos relevantes para el análisis de las sentencias de la Corte Constitucional”, en Novum Jus, 2(1): 125-152, 2008.
QUINTERO, Diana. “Cinco preguntas a Robert Alexy”, en Precedente ICESI, pp. 89-93, 2003.
Shapiro, David. “The role of precedent in constitutional adjudication: an introspection”. En Texas Law Review, 86 (5), 929-956. 2008.
SEGAL, Jeffrey; SPAETH, Harold J. The Supreme Court and the attitudinal model revisited. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002.
STONE, Julius. Precedent and law. Dynamics of common law growth. Sydney: Butterworth, 1985.
SHAPIRO, David. “The role of precedent in constitutional adjudication: an introspection”, en Texas Law Review, 86(5): 929-956, 2008.
UPRIMNY, Rodrigo. Las transformaciones de la Administración de Justicia en Colombia, pp. 261-315. En Sousa Santos, B. y García Villegas, M. (edits.), El caleidoscopio de justicias en Colombia. Bogotá: Siglo del Hombre, pp. 85-150, 2001.
ZULETA, Enrique. Interpretación de la ley - Casos y materiales para su estudio. Buenos Aires: La Ley, 2005.
