PDF (Español (España))
FLIP
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
Abstract
The systematic production of criminal law comes from the works of Kant and Hegel. Based on his writings Metaphysics of Morals and Principles of the Philosophy of Right, there were two main trends that subjective report the criminal law and criminal law objective, with obvious correlations in the various schools of criminal law, visible from nineteenth century. The share of Kant was developed in the article of the previous delivery, and now develops Hegel’s philosophy.
Keywords:
References
ATIENZA, Manuel. El sentido del derecho. Barcelona: Ariel, 2001.
BASTIDA, Xacobe. El derecho como creencia. Una concepción de la filosofía del derecho. Bogotá: Universidad Externado de Colombia, 2000.
BECCARÍA, Cesare. De los delitos y las penas. Madrid: Alianza Editorial, 1982.
BOURDIEU, Pierre; TEUBNER, Gunther. La fuerza del derecho. Bogotá: Uniandes, 2000.
GAIUS. Instituciones jurídicas de Gayo. Santiago: Jurídica de Chile, 2000.
HEGEL, Friedrich. Principios de la filosofía del derecho. Barcelona: Edhasa, 1999.
IHERING, Rudolf Von. El espíritu del derecho romano. Madrid: Marcial Pons, 1997.
JUSTINIANO. Corpus Iuris Civiles [traducción de Luis Ildefonso García del Corral]. Lex Nova, 1889. s.c.
KANT, Immanuel. La metafísica de las costumbres. Bogotá: Rei Andes, 1995.
LINDAHL Elliot, Hans. “La intencionalidad jurídica”, en Universitas Philosophica, núm. 3. Bogotá: Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, 1984.
– Iuris Dictio. Bogotá: Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, 1990.
PARICIO, Javier. Los juristas y el poder político en la antigua Roma, segunda edición. Granada: Comares, 1999.
SEARLE, John. Intencionalidad: un ensayo en la filosofía de la mente. Madrid: Tecnos, 1992.
– Actos de habla. Madrid: Cátedra, 1994.
– La construcción de la realidad social. Barcelona: Paidós, 1997.
SHÜTZ, Alfred. El problema de la realidad social. Buenos Aires: Amorrortu, 1962.
SHÜTZ, Alfred. Fenomenología del mundo social. Introducción a la sociología comprensiva. Buenos Aires: Paidós, 1972.
THEODOIUS. Codex Teheodosianus [traducción de Theodor Mommsen]. Alemania: Weidmann, 1990.
VOLTERRA, Eduardo. Instituciones de derecho privado romano. Madrid: Civitas, 1986.
