pdf
FLIP
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
Abstract
Outer space is characterized by a high technology, high cost, and high risk status. This means not all countries are capable of exploring and using outer space. Nowadays, only technologically developed countries are capable of going on missions and exploiting outer space. A variety of activities have been carried out in space, including commercialization by developed countries. This indicates developed countries’ domination over outer space. Recalling that outer space is the province of all humanity, the exploration and use of space should be for the benefit of all countries and their people. This has challenged developed and developing countries to collaborate in implementing activities in and exploiting outer space. This study is a legal normative research project that utilizes secondary data, including primary and secondary legal materials, as well as non-legal materials, collected through library research and analyzed qualitatively. In realizing justice and reducing the gap between developed and developing countries in terms of outer space exploitation, this research employed a global justice perspective. This concept of justice requires the presence of a global legal authority that distributes rights and obligations to all countries and achieves coordination among developed and developing countries in exploring and using outer space.
Keywords
References
AK, Syahmin, Meria Utama, and Akhmad Idris. Hukum Udara Dan Luar Angkasa (Air and Outer Space Law). Palembang: Unsri Press, 2012.
Amimah, Marini, and Nurannisa Nadya Firdaus. “Peluang Komersialisasi Antariksa Terhadap Perkembangan Teknologi Antariksa Milik Indonesia.” Prosiding Seminar Nasional Kebijakan Penerbangan Dan Antariksa V (SINAS KPA-V) (2020): 66–76. https:// puskkpa.lapan.go.id/files_arsip/03_Marini_Peluang_Komersialisasi_2021_rev.pdf.
Ardes, Runggu Prilia, Cholifah Damayanti, Dikjiratmi, Nessia Marga Leta, and El Renova Ed Siregar. “Perbandingan Sistem Regulasi Asuransi Keantariksaan Beberapa Negara.” Jurnal Kajian Kebijakan Penerbangan Dan Antariksa 1, no. 2 (2021): 89–108. https:// doi.org/10.30536/jkkpa.v1n2.2.
Arthur, Mikaila Lemonik. Law and Justice Around the World: A Comparative Approach. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2020.
Bachtiar. Metode Penelitian Hukum. Tangerang Selatan: UNPAM Press, 2019.
Brooks, Thom. The Oxford Handbook of Global Justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198714354.001.0001.
Diogenes, Diogenes. “Kewenangan United Nations Committee on the Peaceful Uses of Outer Space (Uncopuos) Dalam Pembentukan Hukum Antariksa Internasional.” Dialogia Iuridica: Jurnal Hukum Bisnis Dan Investasi 11, no. 1 (2019): 21–42. https:// doi.org/10.28932/di.v11i1.1953.
European Space Agency. “Types of Orbits.” 2020. https://www.esa.int/Enabling_Support/ Space_Transportation/Types_of_orbits.
Fajar, Mukti, and Yulianto Achmad. Dualisme Penelitian Hukum Normatif & Empiris. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar, 2019.
Faris Alfadh, Muhammad. “Keadilan Global Dan Norma Internasional.” Jurnal Hubungan Internasional 2, no. 2 (2013): 167–74. https://doi.org/10.18196/hi.2013.0038.167-174.
Fox, Sarah Jane. “Policing Mining: In Outer-Space Greed and Domination vs. Peace and Equity, a Governance for Humanity!” Resources Policy 64 (October 2019): 101517. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2019.101517.
Guo, Sujian, Xi Lin, Jean Marc Coicaud, Su Gu, Yanfeng Gu, Qingping Liu, Xuan Qin, Guodong Sun, Zhongyuan Wang, and Chunman Zhang. “Conceptualizing and Measuring Global Justice: Theories, Concepts, Principles and Indicators.” Fudan Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences 12 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/ s40647-019-00267-1.
Hrubec, Marek. “The Law of Peoples and Global Justice: Beyond the Liberal Nationalism of John Rawls.” Human Affairs 20, no. 2 (2010): 135–50. https://doi.org/10.2478/ v10023-010-0015-y.
Intelsat. “About Us.” intelsat.com. Accessed March 5, 2023. https://www.intelsat.com/ about-us/our-story/.
Janssen, Marco A., and Xiao Shan Yap. “Governing Outer Space as a Commons Is Critical for Addressing Commons on Earth.” International Journal of the Commons 18, no. 1 (2024): 32–38. https://doi.org/10.5334/ijc.1378.
Johnson-Freese, Joan, and Kenneth Smith. “U.S. Space Dominance.” In War and Peace in Outer Space, edited by Cassandra and Matthew Hersch Steer. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2021.
Kealotswe-Matlou, Icho. “The Rule of Law in Outer Space, A Call for an International Outer Space Authority.” In War and Peace in Outer Space, edited by Cassandra and Matthew Hersch Steer. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1093/ oso/9780197548684.003.0004.
Kime, Megan. Theories of Global Justice: Relational and Non-Relational Approaches. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2020.
Krepon, Michael, and Christopher Clary. Space Assurance or Space Dominance? The Case Against Weaponizing Space. Washington, DC: The Henry L. Stimson Center, 2003.
Kusumaningtyas, Melissa Retno. “Geostationary Orbit (GSO) Dalam Perspektif Hubungan Utara-Selatan.” In Prosiding Seminar Nasional Kebijakan Penerbangan Dan Antariksa III (Sinas KPA-III) 195–203. 2018. . https://doi.org/10.30536/p.sinaskpa.iii.14.
Moltz, James Clay. “The Changing Dynamics of Twenty-First-Century Space Power.” Journal of Strategic Security 12, no. 1 (2019): 15–43. https://doi.org/10.5038/1944-0472.12.1.1729.
Muhaimin. Metode Peneltian Hukum. Mataram: Mataram University Press, 2020.
Nugraha, Taufik Rachmat. “Program Artemis: Tantangan Hukum Ruang Angkasa di Era Baru.” Veritas et Justitia 8, no. 1 (2022). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.25123/ vej.v8i1.4388.
Nugroho, Arif Satrio. “Posisi Amerika Serikat Terhadap Rezim Da Sar Laut Internasional Otorita Dasar Laut Internasional.” Journal of International Relations 2 (2016): 132–43.
Nugroho, Arif Satrio, and Ika Riswanti Putranti. “International Seabed Regime in Southeast Asia: The Lack of ASEAN Member States’ Role in Seabed Mining.” Indonesian Perspective 3, no. 1 (2018): 37. https://doi.org/10.14710/ip.v3i1.20177.
Phillips, Anne. Global Justice: Just Another Modernisation Theory? In Empire, Race and Global Justice, edited by David Bell. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2019. https:// doi.org/10.1017/9781108576307.007.
Pramono, Agus. “Orbit Geostasioner (GSO) Dalam Hukum Internasional Dan Kepentingan Nasional Indonesia.” Pandecta 6, no. 2 (2011): 128–38.
Putra, Agung Prayuda Yahya. “Urgensi Pengaturan Sui Generis Bagi Negara-Negara Ekuator Khususnya Indonesia.” Jurnal Legalitas 14, no. 1 (2021): 18–40. https://doi. org/10.33756/jelta.v14i01.10209.
Ramadhan, Fazri, and Mohammed Dean Syahreza. “Analisa Kebijakan Space Act Amerika Serikat Sebagai Tantangan Bagi Stabilitas Politik Internasional Dan Politik LuarNegeri Indonesia Dari Sisi Program Keantariksaan.” In Prosiding Seminar Nasional Kebijakan Penerbangan Dan Antariksa III (Sinas KPA-III), 172–86. 2018. https://doi. org/10.30536/p.sinaskpa.iii.12.
Stefanovich, Dmitry V., and Daniel Porras. “Space as a Competition Domain: Threats and Opportunities.” Journal of International Analytics 13, no. 2 (2022): 95–106. https:// doi.org/10.46272/2587-8476-2022-13-2-95-106.
Suharti, T., and M. T. Kumala. “The Urgency of Establishment International Outer Space Authority as Embodiment of Outer Space Environment Protection.” IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering 434, no. 1 (2018). https://doi. org/10.1088/1757-899X/434/1/012239.
Tjitrawati, Aktieva Tri. “Indonesia Dalam Persimpangan Hukum Antariksa.” In Prosiding Seminar Nasional Kebijakan Penerbangan Dan Antariksa III (Sinas KPA-III), 187–94. 2019. https://doi.org/10.30536/p.sinaskpa.iii.13.
Triarda, Reza. “Astropolitik: Signifikansi Ruang Angkasa Terhadap Posisi China Dalam Hubungan Internasional.” Jurnal Interdependence 3, no. 1 (2015): 45–55. http://ejournals.unmul.ac.id/index.php/JHII/article/view/1335.
Tyasworo, Niken, and Mas Nana Jumena. “Tanggung Jawab Perusahaan Dalam Komersialisasi Ruang Angkasa Dan Implikasinya Terhadap Outer Space Treaty 1967 (Studi Tentang Wisata Ruang Angkasa).” Uti Possidetis: Journal of International Law 2, no. 2 (2021): 131–51. https://doi.org/10.22437/up.v2i2.12203.
United Nations General Assembly. Resolution 2222 (XXI), Treaty on Principles Governing the Activities of States in the Exploration and Use of Outer Space, including the Moon and Other Celestial Bodies, 1967.
Wolter, Detlev. Common Security in Outer Space and International Law. Geneva: United Nations Institute for Disarmament Research, 2006.
Yuliantiningsih, Aryuni. “Aspek Hukum Kegiatan Wisata Ruang Angkasa (Space Tourism) Menurut Hukum Internasional.” Jurnal Dinamika Hukum 11, no. 1 (2011). https:// doi.org/10.20884/1.jdh.2011.11.1.87.
Yusliwidaka, Arnanda, Kholis Roisah, and Joko Setiyono. “Measuring the Effectiveness of International Seabed Area Management in Developing Countries.” Russian Law Journal 11, no. 2 (2023): 291–98. https://doi.org/10.52783/rlj.v11i2.665.
Yusliwidaka, Arnanda, Kholis Roisah, and Joko Setiyono. “The Implementation of State’s Rights and Obligations in Outer Space: Is It Equal?” Legality: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum 32, no. 2 (2024): 418–32. https://doi.org/10.22219/ljih.v32i2.35312.
Ziemblicki, Bartosz, and Yevgeniya Oralova. “Private Entities in Outer Space Activities: Liability Regime Reconsidered.” Space Policy 56 (2021): 101427. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. spacepol.2021.101427.
##submission.citations.for##
