html (Español (España))
pdf (Español (España))
FLIP
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
Abstract
The purpose of this article is to highlight the path of desocialization that begins when a person commits a conduct considered punishable within the legal system in which he lives, and who as a result of it is captured, prosecuted and sentenced to imprisonment in a penitentiary or a prison.
When entering the prison, a person will be exposed to an environment of State restrictions, as well as to the exercise of power of other actors which will generate in the being the need to adapt to a subculture that carries with it its own learning, norms and rules, which will be mostly internalized the longer the custodial sentence lasts.
Hence the question arises of what can be done to stop and reverse the process of desocialization that begins when the person commits a crime and that is exacerbated during the execution of the custodial sentence?
The main research problems are developed around:
What factors can contribute to a genuine process of prison resocialization?
The purpose of this article is to examine the path of desocialization that begins when a person commits a punishable conduct and, consequently, is captured, prosecuted and sentenced to a prison term.
commits a punishable conduct and, consequently, is captured, prosecuted and sentenced to deprivation of liberty in a penitentiary and prison
and sentenced to deprivation of liberty in a penitentiary and prison center. There he or she will be exposed to an environment of
to an environment of state restrictions and also to the exercise of power by other actors, which requires her to adapt to a subculture with
to a subculture with its own learning, norms and rules that will be internalized the longer the sentence lasts.
the longer the sentence lasts.
This raises the question of what can be done to halt and reverse the process of desocialization that begins when the prisoner is sentenced to death.
the process of desocialization that begins when the person commits a crime and worsens during the period of imprisonment.
deprivation of liberty. The main research problems are developed around the following issues
the factors that can contribute to a real resocialization process and why prison prevents real reintegration possibilities.
real possibilities of social reintegration for the convicted person.
The research approach used was qualitative. Doctrinal, jurisprudential and legal positions on resocialization
and legal positions on post-penitentiary resocialization were analyzed from secondary sources and individual systematization.
systematization. It was identified that, just as the causes of crime are not unique, neither are the means to prevent recidivism
to avoid recidivism and to have a better chance of resocialization; therefore, time is required,
and a social and professional team to contribute to the process of the convict and post-penitent.
Keywords:
References
Colombia, Congreso de la República. Ley 65 de 1993, “Por la cual se expide el Código Penitenciario y Carcelario”. Bogotá: Diario Oficial núm. 40 999, 20 de agosto de 1993.
Fabras Fres, Núria, Pilar Heras Trías y Sonia Fuertes Ledesma. “La reinserción social postpenitenciaria: un reto para la educación social”. Revista de Educación Social, núm.22 (2016): 143-157, https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=6442624 (acceso agosto 6, 2021).
Foucault, Michael. Vigilar y castigar: nacimiento de una prisión. Ciudad de México: Siglo XXI, 1975.
Instituto Nacional Penitenciario y Carcelario. Informe estrategia rendición de cuentas 2016. Bogotá: Ministerio de Justicia, 2017.
Instituto Nacional Penitenciario y Cancelario. Resolución 3272 de 1995, “Por la cual se reglamente la Ley 65 de 1993”. Bogotá: Diario Oficial núm. 41 983, 31 de agosto de 1995.
Kant, Immanuel. La metafísica de las costumbres. Traducido por Adela Cortina y Jesús Marcial Conill Sancho. Madrid: Tecnos, 2005.
Muñoz Conde, Francisco. “La resocialización del delincuente: análisis y crítica de un mito”. Sistema, núm. 31 (julio 1979): 73-84, https://fundacionsistema.com/la-resocializacion- del-delincuente-analisis-y-critica-de-un-mito/ (acceso agosto 20, 2021).
Rodríguez Devesa, José. “Sobre la necesidad de una política criminal”. Anuario de derecho penal y ciencias penales 34, núm. 2-3 (1981): 699-706.
Romero Miranda, Alejandro. “Prisionización: estructura y dinámica del fenómeno en cárceles estatales del sistema penal chileno”. Revista Latinoamericana de Estudios de Seguridad ̧ núm. 24 (junio-noviembre 2019: 42-58, https://revistas.flacsoandes.edu.ec/urvio/article/view/3791/2635 (acceso agosto 14, 2021).
Zaffaroni, Eugenio Raúl. “La filosofía del sistema penitenciario en el mundo contemporáneo”. Themis, núm. 35 (1997): 179-191.
Reference by
