Artificial intelligence and human rights : an analysis of whether both are convergent or parallel to each other?

Resumo

A inteligência artificial (IA) tem sido fundamental para o diálogo envolvido em uma estrutura estatutária que aborda a criação de um equilíbrio entre a IA e os direitos humanos por governos em todo o mundo. Em 1997, Gary Kasparov, grão-mestre de xadrez e campeão mundial, foi derrotado pelo Deep Blue, um computador retangular preto desenvolvido pela IBM Inc. Uma nova era começou na frente do mundo inteiro quando uma máquina derrotou uma das mais brilhantes e inteligentes pessoas do planeta, em um dos jogos mais intelectualmente desafiadores já criados pelos homens. Depois de discutir uma infinidade de prós e contras da IA ​​em relação aos direitos humanos, a criação e o aumento do uso da IA ​​ganharam impulso para uma regulamentação necessária da indústria da IA. Uma cobertura mais ampla e uma equidade substancial por meio do recurso legal a diferentes tipos de violações dos direitos humanos no setor de serviços e trabalho mostraram ser a necessidade da hora. O uso da IA ​​tem seus proponentes e oponentes; no entanto, algumas formas de IA são importantes e desejáveis ​​para uma evolução humana tecnologicamente moderna. No entanto, a pergunta perturbadora que surge hoje é se, ao transferir a experiência do passado para o futuro, o desemprego em massa, a pobreza em massa e as distorções sociais ainda são um cenário possível para o novo mundo, um mundo onde robôs, sistemas inteligentes e algoritmos desempenham um papel cada vez mais central. Este artigo faz uma análise crítica dos efeitos da IA ​​nos direitos humanos por meio de lentes de estruturas econômicas, relações de trabalho, perfis de trabalho e modelos de remuneração e tempo de trabalho bem estabelecidos, que sofrerão grandes mudanças devido ao aumento do uso da IA. Ao desmistificar precedentes recentes na arena internacional, o artigo procura lançar luz sobre o impacto fundamental de novos desenvolvimentos técnicos no mercado de trabalho global nos próximos anos, não apenas em empregos industriais, mas no núcleo das tarefas humanas no serviço setor considerado "intocável". Consequentemente, olhando para os dois lados da moeda, discute concisamente a polaridade da ausência de qualquer reconhecimento estatutário da IA ​​e seu impacto.

Palavras-chave:

Inteligência artificial Direitos humanos Setor de serviços Indústria do trabalho Patrimônio Máquina Indústria de ia

Referências

Acemoglu, Daron and Pascual Restrepo. Robots and Jobs: Evidence from US Labor Markets, NBER Working Paper No. 23285, Cambridge: National Bureau of Economic Research, 2017.

AI Now Report. The Social and Economic Implications of Artificial Intelligence Technologies inthe Near-Term. A summary of the AI Now public symposium, hosted by the White House and New York Universitys Information Law Institute, July 7th, 2016. Version 1.0, 22 September, 2016, https://artificialintelligencenow.com.

Angwin, Julia, Jeff Larson, Surya Mattu and Lauren Kirchner. Machine bias. Pro-Publica (23 May 2016). https://www.propublica.org/article/machine-bias-risk-assessments-in-criminal-sentencing.

Arntz, Melanie, Terry Gregory and Ulrich Zierahn. The Risk of Automation for Jobs in OECD Countries. A Comparative Analysis. Paris: OECD, 2016. http://www.ifuturo.org/sites/default/files/docs/automation.pdf

Arthur, W. Brian. The nature of technology: What it is and how it evolves. London: Allen Lane, 2009.

Berloznik, Robby, Raf Casert, Robby Deboelpaep et al. eds. Technology Assessment on Converging Technologies. Brussels: European Parliament, STOA, 2006.

Biocca, Frank. Media and the laws of mind. Preface to G. Riva, F. Davide, and Isselstein, eds. Being There: Concepts, effects and measurements of user presence in synthetic environments. Amsterdam: IOS Press, 2003, v-ix.Bostrom, Nick y Vincent C. Millar. Future progress in artificial intelligence: A survey of expert opinion. En Fundamental Issues of Artificial Intelligence. Vincent C. Muller (ed.). Berlin, Springer: Synthese Library, 2016.

Bozdag, Engin. Bias in algorithmic filtering and personalization. Ethics and Information Technology 15, no. 3 (2013): 209-27.

Cattaneo, Gabriella, Giorgio Micheletti, Alys Woodward, and David Osimo. European Data Market SMART 2013/0063 D 3.6 and D 3.7 Data Ownership and Access to Data Key Emerging Issues. Final Release January 29, 2016.

Christl, Wolfie and Sarah Spiekermann. Networks of Control. A Report on Corporate Surveillance, Digital Tracking, Big Data & Privacy. Vienna: Facultas, 2016.

Citron, Danielle K., and Frank Pasquale. The scored society: Due process for automated predictions. Washington Law Review 89 (2014): 1; University of Maryland Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2014-8. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2376209

Coeckelbergh, Mark. Health care, capabilities, and AI assistive technologies. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 13, no. 2 (2010): 181-90.

Council of Europe. Young people combating hate speech on-line. Strasbourg: Council of Europe, April 15, 2012.

Donahoe, Eileen. So Software Has Eaten the World: What Does It Mean for Human Rights, Security & Governance Part 1. Human Rights Watch (March 22, 2016). https://www.hrw.org/news/2016/03/22/so-software-haseaten-world-what-does-it-mean-human-rights-security-governance.

Duch-Brown, Nestor, Bertin Martens, and Frank Mueller-Langer. The economics of ownership, access and trade in digital data. JRC Working Papers on Digital Economy no. 2017-01. https://econpapers.repec.org/paper/iptdecwpa/2017-01.html

Eskens, Sarah, Jelte Timmer, Linda Kool, and Rinie van Est. Beyond control. Exploratory study on the discourse in Silicon Valley about consumer privacy in the Internet of Things. The Hague: Rathenau Instituut, 2016. https://pure.uva.nl/ws/files/2779138/176164_Beyond_Control_Final_04042016.pdf

European Data Protection Supervisor (EDPS). Opinion 4/2017 on the Proposal for a Directive on certain aspects concerning contracts for the supply of digital content (14 March 2017).

European Parliament Committee on Legal Affairs (JURI Committee). Report with recommendations to the Commission on Civil Law Rules on Robotics (2015/2103[INL]) (27 January 2017).

Eyal, Nir and Ryan Hoover. Hooked: How to Build Habit-Forming Products. New York: Penguin Random House, 2014.

Finders, Karl. IPsoft gives automation platform a face. ComputerWeekly.com (September 30, 2014). https://www.computerweekly.com/news/2240231755/IPsoft-givesautomation-platform-a-face [Accessed 29 June 2016].

Frey, Carl Benedict and Michael A. Osborne. The Future of Employment: How Susceptible are Jobs to Computerization? Oxford: Oxford Martin School, 2013.

Fuchs, Michael. Session 2 - Technology, intervention and control of individuals. Emerging technologies and human rights. International Symposium, Strasbourg, 4-5 May 2015.

Garvie, Clare, Alvaro Bedoya, and Jonathan Frankle. The perpetual line-up: Unregulated police face recognition in America. Georgetown Law Center on Privacy & Technology (18 October 2016). www.perpetuallineup.org.

Horvitz, Eric. One Hundred Year Study on Artificial Intelligence: Reflections and Framing. Microsoft.com (January 1, 2014). https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/research/publication/one-hundred-year-study-artificial-intelligence-reflections-framing/

International Working Group on Data Protection in Telecommunications (Berlin Telecom Group). Working Paper on Web Tracking and Privacy. Respect for Context, Transparency and Control Remains Essential. 53rd meeting, Prague, April 15-16, 2013.

Kaminski, Margot E. and Shane Witnov. The Conforming Effect: First Amendment Implications of Surveillance, Beyond Chilling Speech. University of Richmond Law Review 49 (2015); Ohio State Public Law Working Paper No. 288. https://ssrn.com/abstract=2550385.

Koebler, Jason. Why American farmers are hacking their tractors with Ukrainian firmware. Motherboard (March 21, 2017), https://motherboard.vice.com/en_us/article/why-american-farmers-arehacking-their-tractors-with-ukrainian-firmware.

Kool, Linda, Jelte Timmer, and Rinie van Est, eds. Sincere support: The rise of the e-coach. The Hague: Rathenau Instituut, 2015. https://www.rathenau.nl/nl/publicatie/sincere-support-rise-e-coach.

Koops, Bert-Jaap, Angela Di Carlo, Luca Nocco, et al. Robotic technologies and fundamental rights: Robotics challenging the European constitutional framework. International Journal of Technoethics 4, no. 2 (2013): 15-35.

Kosinski, Michal, David Stillwell, and Thore Graepel. Private traits and attributes are predictable from digital records of human behavior. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America (PNAS) 110, no. 15 (2013): 5802-5.

Kranzberg, Melvin. Technology and History: Kranzbergs Laws. Technology and Culture 27, no. 3 (1986): 544-60.

Leroux, Christophe, and Roberto Labruto. D3.2.1 Ethical legal and societal issues in robotics. euRobotics The European Robotics Coordination Action (December 31, 2012). http://www.eurobotics-project.eu/cms/upload/PDF/euRobotics_Deliverable_D.3.2.1_ELS_IssuesInRobotics.pdf

Levin, McCorduck, Moerel E.M.L. and J.E.J. Prins. Privacy voor de homo digitalis?. En:Homo Digitalis. E.M.L. Moerel, J.E.J. Prins, M. Hildebrandt, T.F.E TjongTjin Tai, G-J. Zwenne and A.H.J. Schmidt (eds.). Handelingen Nederlandse Juristen-Vereniging 146e jaargang/2016-I. Wolters Kluwer, 2016.

Levin, Sam, and Nicky Woolf. Tesla driver killed while using autopilot was watching Harry Potter, The Guardian (1 July 2016). https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2016/jul/01/tesla-driver-killed-autopilot-self-driving-car-harry-potter

O Manique, Colleen. The Securitization of HIV/AIDS in Sub-Saharan Africa: A critical feminist lens. In A Decade of Human Security: Global Governance and New Multilateralisms, Sandra J. Maclean, David R. Black, and Timothy M. Shaw (eds.). New York: Ashgate Press, 2006, 161-178.

Pariser, Eli. The filter bubble: What the Internet is hiding from you. London: Penguin Books, 2011.

Purdy, Mark, and Ladan Davarzani. The Growth Game-Changer: How the Industrial Internet of Things Can Drive Progress and Prosperity, Accenture, 2015. https://www.accenture.com/_acnmedia/Accenture/Conversion-Assets/DotCom/Documents/Global/PDF/Dualpub_18/Accenture-Executive-Summary-Growth-Game-Changer-Industrial-Internet.pdf [Accessed 29 June 2016].

Rouvroy, Antoinette. Of data and men. Fundamental rights and freedoms in a world of big data. Council of Europe, Directorate General of Human Rights and Rule of Law l, T-PD-BUR(2015)09REV (2016). http://works.bepress.com/antoinette_rouvroy/64/

Scherer, Matthew U. Regulating artificial intelligence systems: Risks, challenges, competencies, and strategies. Harvard Journal of Law and Technology 29, no. 2 (2016).

Schneier, Bruce. The Public-Private Surveillance Partnership. Schneier on Security (August 5, 2013). https://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2013/08/the_publicpriva_1.html

Science and Technology Options Assessment (STOA). Ethical Aspects of Cyber-Physical Systems. Scientific Foresight Study. Brussels: European Parliament, 2016.

Scott, James C. Seeing like a State. Yale University Press, 1999.

Sharkey, Amanda, and Noel Sharkey. Granny and the robots: Ethical issues in robot care for elderly. Ethics and Information Technology 14, no. 1 (2012): 27-40.

Song, Won-Kyung, and Jongbae Kim. Novel assistive robot for self-feeding. In: Robotic Systems - Applications, Control and Programming, edited by Ashish Dutta, 2012. https://www.intechopen.com/books/robotic-systems-applications-control-and-programming/novel-assistive-robot-for-self-feeding

Stahl, Bernd C., Job Timmermans, and Catherine Flick. Ethics of emerging information and communication technologies: On the implementation of responsible research and innovation. Science and Public Policy 44, no. 3 (2016): 1-13.

Strand, Roger, and Matthias Kaiser. Report on ethical issues raised by emerging sciences and technologies. Norway: Centre for the Study of the Sciences and the Humanities, University of Bergen, 23 January 2015.

Sunstein, Cass R. Echo chambers: Bush v. Gore, impeachment, and beyond. Princeton & Oxford: Princeton University Press, 2001.

Tantzen, Bryan. Connected machines: Reducing unplanned downtime and improving service. Cisco Blogs (October 6, 2015). https://blogs.cisco.com/manufacturing/connected-machines-reducing-downtime [Accessed 29 June 2016].

The Senior Project. Ethics of e-inclusion of older people. Senior Discussion Paper no.2008/01. (April 2008). http://www.cssc.eu/public/Ethics%20of%20e-Inclusion%20of%20older%20people%20-%20Bled%20%20Paper.pdf.

Tjong Tjin Tai, Eric. Privaatrecht voor de homo digitalis: eigendom, gebruik en handhaving?. In Homo Digitalis. E.M.L. Moerel, J.E.J. Prins, M. Hildebrandt, et al. Schmidt Handelingen Nederlandse Juristen-Vereniging 146e jaargang/2016-I. Wolters Kluwer, 2016.

Turkle, Sherry. Alone together: Why we expect more from technology and less from each other. New York: Basic Books, 2011.

Turkle, Sherry. Reclaiming conversation: The power of talk in a digital age. New York: Basic Books, 2015.

United Nations Development Program. The Human Development Report. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1994.

Van Alsenoy, B., V. Verdoodt, R. Heyman, E. Wauters, J. Ausloos y G. Acar. From social media service to advertising network. A critical analysis of Facebooks revised policies and terms. KU Leuven Center for IT & IP Law - iMinds,Working Paper, version: 1.3 (2015). https://www.law.kuleuven.be/citip/en/news/item/icri-cir-advises-belgian-privacy-commission-in-facebookinvestigation.

Van de Poel, Ibo, and Lamber Royakkers. Ethics, technology, and engineering: An introduction. Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell, 2011.

Van Est, Rinie, and Dirk Stemerding (eds.) European governance challenges in bioengineering Making perfect life: Bio-engineering (in) the 21st century. Final report. Brussels: European Parliament, STOA, 2012. https://www.rathenau.nl/nl/publicatie/making-perfect-life-final-report.

Van Est, Rinie, Dirk Stemerdink, Virgil Rerimassie, Mirjam Schuijff, Jelte Timmer, and Frans Brom. From bio to NBIC From medical practice to daily life. Report written for Council of Europe, Committee on Bioethics. The Hague: Rathenau Instituut, 2014. https://www.rathenau.nl/nl/publicatie/bio-nbic-convergencemedical-practice-daily-life.

Van Est, Rinie, Jelte Timmer, Linda Kool, et al. Rules for the digital human park: Two paradigmatic cases of breeding and taming human beings: Human germline editing and persuasive technology. Background Paper for the 11th Global Summit of National Ethics/ Bioethics Commissions, Berlin, March 16-18, 2016. https://www.rathenau.nl/nl/publicatie/regels-voor-het-digitale-mensenpark.

Van Est, Rinie, Virgil Rerimassie, Ira van Keulen, and Gaston Dorren. Intimate technology: The battle for our body and behaviour. The Hague: Rathenau Instituut, 2014. https://www.rathenau.nl/en/publication/intimate-technology-battly-our-body-and-behaviour.

Wachter, Sandra, Brent Mittelstadt, and Luciano Floridi. Why a right to explanation of automated decision-making does not exist in the general data protection regulation. (December 28, 2016). https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2903469.

Weisberg, Jacob. We are hopelessly hooked. The New York Review of Books (February 2016): 6-9, http://www.nybooks.com/articles/2016/02/25/we-are-hopelessly-hooked/

Ylimaula, Anssi, Peter H.M.P. Roelofsma, and Leo Versteeg. Deliverable 3.2. Ethical and legal requirements. Amsterdam: Center of Advanced Media Research & Department of Social Gerontology, VUA University, 2010.

Zentner, Manfred. Education for participation in a digitalised world?. Youth Partnership Partnership between the European Commission and the Council of Europe in the field of youth. Report. Symposium on youth participation in a digitalised world. Budapest (14-16 September 2015). https://pjp-eu.coe.int/documents/1017981/8525351/Education%E2%80%93+participation-digitalised-world.pdf/212f8046-1274-4575-9834-b261bab9697f

Zuiderveen Borgesius, Frederik. Improving privacy protection in the area of behavioural targeting. Alphen aan den Rijn: Kluwer Law International, 2014.

##submission.citations.for##