How to Cite
Pérez Salazar, B., & Gómez Horta, R. (2010). Alternatives for administrative penalties and consumer protection psychoactive substances in Colombia : lessons from the experiences of U.S.A. and the Uk with the drug treatment courts. Novum Jus, 4(2), 127–159. Retrieved from https://novumjus.ucatolica.edu.co/article/view/695
License

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

    1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
    2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
    3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).

Abstract

The recently approved reform of Article 49 of the Constitution of Colombia introduces a new administrative sanction and protection system for illicit drug users in the country. This article discusses the scope of this new system as well as the contents of a bill setting administrative procedures to enact it, in the light of lessons learned from experiences with Drug Treatment Courts in USA and UK, where this mechanism has operated with promising results for a number of years based on the “harm reduction” doctrine.

Keywords:

References

DANE. “Proyecciones nacionales y departamentales de población, 2006-2020”. Bogotá: DANE, 2007, p. 77.

DEGENHARDT, L. et al. “Toward a Global View of Alcohol, Tobacco, Cannabis, and Cocaine Use: Findings from the WHO World Mental Health Surveys”. Public Library of Science Medicine 5, núm. 7, 2008, p. 1059.

FESTINGER, D. S. et al. “Status hearings in drug court: When more is less and less is more”. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, núm. 68, 2002, pp. 151-157.

GOLDKAMP, J. S. “The impact of drug courts”, Criminology & Public Policy, núm. 2, 2003, pp. 197-206.

HUMAN RIGHTS WATCH. “Punishment and Prejudice: Racial Disparities in the War on Drug”’. A Human Rights Watch Report, 12(2G), 2000.

KANDEL, D. B. et al. “Patterns of drug use from adolescence to early adulthood: I. Periods of risk for initiation, continued use and discontinuation”. American Journal of Public Health, núm. 74, 1984, pp. 660-665.

KASSEBAUM, G. et al. “The drug court as a sentencing model”. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, núm. 17, 2001, pp. 89-104.

LEROY, B. “International drug policy: challenges and perspectives”. En: Global Drug Policy: Building a New Framework. Senslis Council-The 2003 Lisbon International Symposium on Global Drug Policy, 2003, pp. 7-14.

LONGSHORE, D. et al. “Drug courts: a conceptual framework”. Journal of Drug Issues, núm. 31, 2001, pp. 7-26.

MARLOWE, D. B. et al. “Are judicial status hearings a key component of drug court?”. Criminal Justice and Behavior, núm. 30, 2003, pp. 141-162.

MCGUIRE, J. (ed.) What Works Reducing Reoffending, Chichester: John Wiley and Sons, 1995.

OLSON, A. E. et al. “Implementing the key components of specialized drug treatment courts: Practice and policy considerations”. Law & Policy, núm. 23, 2001, pp. 171-196.

PÉREZ SALAZAR, B. Control del consumo de sustancias psicoactivas en Colombia: tendencias en el manejo de trastornos relacionados y pautas para su reglamentación legal [en imprenta].

REMPEL, M. “Reincidencia 101: evaluando el impacto de su tribunal de tratamiento de drogas”. En: Conceptos, núm. 16, Fundación Paz Ciudadana, 2010.

REPÚBLICA DE COLOMBIA, “Ley 30 de 1986 por la cual se adopta el Estatuto Nacional de Estupefacientes”, 1986.

______. “Sentencia C-221 de 1994. Declaración de inexequibilidad de los artículos 51 y 87 de la ley 30 de 1986, que impide que revivan normas de contenido similar, que fueron derogadas por la ley en cuestión”, magistrado ponente: Dr. Carlos Gaviria Díaz. Disponible en: https://www.mamacoca.org/foro_legal/sentencia_C221_de_1994.htm.

______, Policía Nacional, 2006-2009. “Capturas realizadas según modalidad delictiva”. Revista de Criminalidad, núms. 48- 51.

______. Estudio nacional de consumo de sustancias psicoactivas en Colombia (2008). Bogotá: Ministerio de la Protección Social - Dirección Nacional de Estupefacientes, 2009.

______. “Proyecto de ley 248 de 2010 - Senado”, art. 3o , 2010, pp. 2-3.

SANFORD, S. et al. “Lifting the Cover on Drug Courts: Evaluation Findings and Policy Concerns”. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 49(3), pp. 239-258.

SAUM, C. A. et al. “Violent offenders in drug court”. Journal of Drug Issues, 31(1), 2001, pp. 107-128.

UNODC. Drug Dependence Treatment: Sustained Recovery Management. Viena: Treatnet - Good Practice Document, 2008, p. 17.

______. “From coercion to cohesion. Treating drug dependence through health care, not punishment”. Viena: Discussion paper, 2009, p. 9.

WEXLER, D. “Book review: A Review of «What Works: Reducing Reoffending”. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 15(3), 1997, pp. 365-370.

Documentos en Internet

DANE. “Estimaciones 1985-2005 y proyecciones 2006-2020 anualizadas por sexo y edad”. Disponible en: http://www.dane.gov.co/index.php?option=com_content&task=category&sectionid=16&id=496&Itemid=996.

REPÚBLICA DE COLOMBIA. Consejo Nacional de Seguridad Social en Salud [en línea]: Acuerdo 405 de 2008. Disponible en: http://www.consultorsalud.com/biblioteca/acuerdos/Acuerdo%20405%20de%202008%20-%20Presupuesto%20Fosyga%202009.pdf.

______.“Decreto 135 de 2010, por medio del cual se distribuyen recursos del Frisco para el fortalecimiento de la Política Nacional para la Reducción del Consumo de Sustancias Psicoactivas y su Impacto, y se dictan otras disposiciones”, art. 1; decreto inexequible, 2010.

______. Departamento Nacional de Planeación (DNP). “Gastos del Estado colombiano en la lucha contra el problema de las drogas (2005-2006)”. Bogotá: Departamento Nacional de Planeación, 2008. Disponible en: http://odc.dne.gov.co/IMG/pdf/Gasto_Drogas__2005-2006__07_May_2009_VF_2_.pdf, p. 25.

REUTER, P. “Assessing U.S. Drug Policy. Materials for the first debate of the Latin American Commission on Drugs and Democracy”, 2008. Disponible en: http://drugsanddemocracy.org/files/2008/06/peter_reuter_ingles.pdf.

UK DRUG POLICY COMMISSION [en línea]. “Moving towards Real Impact Drug Enforcement Strategy and policy implications”. Disponible en: http://www.ukdpc.org.uk/resources/HR_Enforce_Policy_Briefing.pdf.

UNODC. “Expert Working Group Report on DTC Best Practices”, 1999. Disponible en http://www.unodc.org/pdf/lap_report_ewg_casework.pdf.

______. Informe Mundial de Drogas 2009. Resumen ejecutivo, 2009. Disponible en: http://www.unodc.org/documents/wdr/WDR_2009/Executive_summary_Spanish.pdf.

WHITE, W. et al. “Recovery Capital; a Primer for Addiction Professionals”, 2008. Disponible en: http://www.counselormagazine.com/feature-articles-mainmenu-63/27-treatmentstrategies-or-protocols/816-recovery-capital-a-primer-for-addiction-professionals.

WHO. The World Health Report 2002. Reducing risks, promoting healthy life. Geneva: WHO,

ABC NEWS [en línea]: Expanding drug treatment: Is US ready to step up?, november 9, 2009. Disponible en: http://abcnews.go.com/Business/wireStory?id=9032639.

Eltiempo.com: “Consumo de droga como falta menor, con rehabilitación obligatoria al adicto,propone el Gobierno” [marzo 25 de 2009].

Eltiempo.com [en línea]: “Más de 450 ‘ollas’ de droga hay en Bogotá; mueven al año unos 300.000 millones de pesos” [noviembre 8 de 2009].

Eltiempo.com. “Se abre debate por ‘tribunal especial’ para portadores de droga” [marzo 3 de 2009].

THE WALL STREET JOURNAL [en línea]: White House Czar Calls for End to “War on Drugs” [mayo 14 de 2009]. Disponible en: http://online.wsj.com/article/SB124225891527617397.html.

THE WASHINGTON POST [en línea]: “It’s time to Legalize Drugs”, August 17, 2009. Disponible en: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/08/16/AR2009081601758.html.

“Tribunales de tratamiento de drogas” [en línea]. Disponible en: http://www.unodc.org/newsletter/es/200503/page003.html.

“UNODC and Drug Treatment Courts” [en línea]. Disponible en: http://www.unodc.org/unodc/en/legal-tools/Drug-Treatment-Courts.html.

Reference by

Sistema OJS 3 - Metabiblioteca |