How to Cite
Prieto Salas, M. A. (2015). Morality as a basis for the axiomatization process. Novum Jus, 9(1), 29–49. https://doi.org/10.14718/NovumJus.2015.9.1.2
License

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

    1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
    2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
    3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).

Abstract

The process of axiomatization of human behavior by establishing restrictive laws can be illustrated by means of the theory of the construction of valid moral positions developed by Ronald Dworkin, in which it is evident the presence of elements of coherence between the system of human beliefs. These well-structured elements underpin a valid moral, along with other common agreement, may prohibit behaviors that jeopardize the community. The purpose of the article is to undermine the principles defended by the ideological positivism, which flatly rejects the influence of public morals within a legal system" for achieving that, it is necessary to elucidate the link between conventional public morality and the regulatory system as an indissoluble bond. Under the agreement, the members of a society proscribe specific behaviors, considered as "immoral". Though superficially this is a plausible hypothesis, it becomes more complex when we try to apply it to a modern society characterized by multiculturalism.

Keywords:

References

Austin, John. El objeto de la jurisprudencia. Madrid: Centro de Estudios Políticos y Constitucionales, 2002.

Dworkin, Ronald. Los derechos en serio. Barcelona: Ariel, 2007.

Echave Delia, Ricardo Guibourg y María Urquijo. Lógica, proposición y norma. Buenos Aires: Astrea, 2008.

Gianella de Salama, Alicia y Margarita Roulet. Lógica simbólica y elementos de metodología de la ciencia. Buenos Aires: El Ateneo, 1986.

Habermas, Jurgen. Teoría de la acción comunicativa. Madrid: Trota, 2010.

Hart, Herbert. El concepto del Derecho. Buenos Aires: Abeledo-Perrot, 1968.

Kant, Immanuel. La metafísica de las costumbres. Madrid: Tecnos, 2002.

Kelsen, Hans. Teoría pura del Derecho. México D. F.: Dirección de publicaciones UNAM, 1986.

Nino, Carlos. Introducción al análisis del Derecho. Barcelona: Ariel, 1983.

Santo Tomás de Aquino. La suma de Teología II parte I-II. Madrid: Biblioteca de autores cristianos, 1993.

Schmill, Ulises. Lógica y Derecho. México D. F.: Fontamara, 2008.

Von Wright, Georg. Normas, verdad y lógica. México D. F.: Fontamara, 2001.

Reference by

Sistema OJS 3 - Metabiblioteca |