html (Español (España))
PDF (Español (España))
FLIP
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
Abstract
The analysis of complex social phenomena is undertaken through various perspectives: law, economics, sociology, politics, psychology, among others. Each one has a specific, more or less differentiated, methodology or approach to grasp the dimensions of said phenomena. Hence, the purpose of this article is to assess the convenience of using an interdisciplinary approach that combines law and institutional economics as a tool of analysis. I use the term “law and economics” instead of “economic analysis of law,” as the latter is a discipline applied inherently by economists, while the former approach implies the equal implementation of these two disciplines with less rigor, but greater a scope. To substantiate this claim, the article briefly considers the notion of property using the tools of institutional analysis and modern legal theory of systems. As a result, the article makes a comprehensive outline of the essential aspects of property within economic and legal science, as well as justifies the use of the law and economics approach.
Keywords:
References
Alexy, Robert. Ensayos sobre la teoría de los principios y el juicio de proporcionalidad. Lima: Palestra Editores, 2019.
Allen, Douglas W. “Property rights, transaction costs, and coase: One more time”. En Coasean Economics: Law and economics and the new institutional economics, editado por Steven G. Medema. Recent Economic Thought Series 60. Boston Dordrecht London: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1998.
Aoki, Masahiko. Toward a comparative institutional analysis. Comparative institutional analysis 2. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press, 2001.
Barzel, Yoram. A theory of the state: economic rights, legal rights, and the scope of the state. Political economy of institutions and decisions. Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press, 2002.
Botero Bernal, Andrés. “El código civil de Andrés Bello y el movimiento exegético en Colombia”. Comparative Law Review, vol. 9, n.o 1 (2018): 155-74.
Chavance, Bernard. Léconomie Institutionnelle. Paris: La Découverte, 2007.
Coase, R. H. “The Nature of the Firm”. Economica, vol. 4, n.o 16 (1937): 386-405. https://doi.org/10.2307/2626876.
“The Problem of Social Cost”. The Journal of Law & Economics, vol. 3 (1960): 1-44. Colombia. Código General del Proceso, Pub. L. No. Ley 1564 de 2012 de Colombia (2012). http://www.secretariasenado.gov.co/senado/basedoc/ley_1564_2012.html.
Constitución Política de Colombia, Pub. L. No. 116 de 1991 de Colombia (1991). Cornu, Gérard. Linguistique juridique. 3. éd. Domat droit privé. Paris: Montchrestien, 2005. Cuniberti, Gilles. Grands systèmes de droit contemporains. 2. éd. Paris: L.G.D.J., Lextenso Éd, 2011.
Deakin, Simon, David Gindis, Geoffrey M. Hodgson, Kainan Huang, y Pistor Katharina. “Legal Institutionalism: Capitalism and the constitutive role of law”. Journal of Comparative Economics, vol. 45 (2017): 188-200.
Demsetz, Harold. “Toward a theory of property rights”. The American Economic Review, vol. 57, n.o 2 (1967): 347-59.
Ellickson, Robert C. Order without law: how neighbors settle disputes. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press, 1991.
Guinchard, Serge y Jean-Luc Albert, eds. Lexique des termes juridiques. 23. éd., 2015-2016. Paris: Dalloz, 2015.
Hodgson, Geoffrey M. “Much of the ‘economics of property rights’ devalues property and legal rights”. Journal of Institutional Economics, vol. 11, n.o 4 (2015): 683-709. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1744137414000630.
Ortiz de Urbina Gimeno, Íñigo. “El análisis económico del derecho”. En Observar la ley: ensayos sobre metodología de la investigación jurídica. Madrid; Editorial Trotta, S.A., 2010.
Kelsen, Hans. Teoría pura del derecho. Serie G: Estudios Doctrinales 20. México: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, 1982.
Kluger, Viviana, ed. Análisis económico del derecho. 1. ed. Buenos Aires: Heliasta, 2006. Landreth, Harry y David C. Colander. History of economic thought. 4th ed. Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 2002.
Lichtenberg, Georg Christoph, y Juan del Solar. Aforismos. 3. reimpr. Barcelona: Edhasa, 1991.
Medema, Steven G., ed. Coasean economics: Law and economics and the new institutional economics. Recent Economic Thought Series 60. Boston Dordrecht London: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1998.
Ménard, Claude y Mary M. Shirley, eds. Handbook of new institutional economics. Dordrecht: Springer, 2005.
Miller, Geoffrey P. “Law and economics versus economic analysis of law”. American Bankruptcy Institute Law Review, n.o Issue 2 (2011): 459.
Nicholson, Walter y Christopher Snyder. Intermediate microeconomics and its applications. 11th ed. Australia, Mason, OH: South-Western Cengage Learning, 2010.
North, Douglas. C. “Institutions”. Journal of Economic Perspectives, vol. 5 (1991): 91-112. Institutions, institutional change, and economic performance. The Political economy of institutions and decisions. Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press, 1990.
Posner, Richard A. Economic analysis of law. 7th ed. New York, NY: Wolters Kluwer Law & Business: Aspen Publishers, 2007.
República de Colombia. Código Civil, Pub. L. No. Ley 84 de 1873. Accedido 23 de febrero de 2020. http://www.secretariasenado.gov.co/senado/basedoc/codigo_civil.html.
Shavell, Steven. Foundations of economic analysis of law. Cambridge, Mass: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 2004.
Sola, Juan Vicente. “Metodología de la economía positiva, los límites de la predicción”. Revista Libertas, vol. XIII, n.o 45 (octubre de 2006). https://www.eseade.edu.ar.
Vesting, Thomas. Teoría del derecho. Bogotá: Universidad Externado de Colombia, 2018.
Williamson, Oliver E. “The new institucional economics: Taking stock, looking ahead”. Journal of Economic Perspectives, vol. XXXVIII (2000): 595-613.
Reference by
