PDF (Español (España))
FLIP
HTML (Español (España))
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
Abstract
The article examines one of the most controversial issues in terms of legal aspects and communication at the beginning of the 21st century: social networks on the Internet, which arose in response to the human need for communication and personal, professional, and sentimental ties. Since there is no direct personal relationship with the person you interact with, there might be room for the violation of fundamental rights related to the person?s conscience. In virtual social networks, it is easy to project a profile that reflects an identity that, in some cases, does not correspond to reality. The virtual interactive environment allows for the person on the other side of the computer to change his or her identity, as it happens with individuals seeking friendship for criminal purposes, and to jeopardize the integrity and honor of individuals. The right to privacy is evidently affected by social networks, either by third parties or by the profile owners themselves who expose their private lives without considering the consequences and social impact, given the rapid dissemination of information allowed by the Internet.
References
Alexy, Robert. “Los derechos fundamentales en el Estado democrático de Derecho” en Neoconstitucionalismo(s), editado por Miguel Carbonell, 31-48. Madrid: Trotta, 2003.
Alexy, Robert. Teoría de los derechos fundamentales. Madrid: Centro de Estudios Constitucionales, 1993.
Bernal Pulido, Carlos. “Estructura y límites de la ponderación”. Doxa. Cuadernos de Filosofía del Derecho, núm. 26 (2003): 225-238.
Carbonell Sánchez, Miguel. Los derechos fundamentales en México. Ciudad de México: UNAM, 2004.
Cardoso, Gustavo. Los medios de comunicación en la sociedad red. Filtros, escaparates y noticias. Barcelona: UOC ediciones, 2008.
Castells, Manuel. La era de la información. Economía, sociedad y cultura. Vol. 1. Ciudad de México: Siglo XXI, 2005.
Corte Constitucional. Sentencia C-640 de 18 de agosto de 2010. M. P. Mauricio González Cuervo.
Corte Constitucional. Sentencia SU-157 de 10 de marzo de 1999. M. P. Alejandro Martínez Caballero.
Corte Constitucional. Sentencia T-414 de 16 de junio de 1992. M. P. Ciro Angarita Barón.
Corte Constitucional. Sentencia T-632 de 15 de agosto de 2007. M. P. Humberto Sierra Porto.
Corte Constitucional. Sentencia T-634 de 13 de septiembre de 2013. M. P. María Victoria Calle Correa.
Ferrajoli, Luigi. Los fundamentos de los derechos fundamentales. Madrid: Trotta, 2001.
García Canclini, Néstor. Reabrir espacios públicos. Políticas culturales y ciudadanía. Ciudad de México: UAM, Plaza y Valdés, 2004.
Gutiérrez Boada, John Daniel. Los límites entre la intimidad y la información. Bogotá: Universidad Externado, 2001.
Llano, Jairo Vladimir. “Teoría del Derecho y pluralismo jurídico”. Criterio Jurídico 12, núm. 1 (2012): 191-214.
Nieto, Ana. “Las 30 redes sociales más utilizadas”. http://www.webempresa20.com/blog/las-30-redes-sociales-mas-utilizadas.html (acceso agosto 20, 2015).
Reference by
