PDF (English)
FLIP
HTML (English)
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Aquellos autores/as que tengan publicaciones con esta revista, aceptan los términos siguientes:
- Los autores/as conservarán sus derechos de autor y garantizarán a la revista el derecho de primera publicación de su obra, el cuál estará simultáneamente sujeto a la Licencia de reconocimiento no comercial de Creative Commons que permite a terceros compartir la obra siempre que se indique su autor y su primera publicación esta revista.
- Los autores/as podrán adoptar otros acuerdos de licencia no exclusiva de distribución de la versión de la obra publicada (p. ej.: depositarla en un archivo telemático institucional o publicarla en un volumen monográfico) siempre que se indique la publicación inicial en esta revista.
- Se permite y recomienda a los autores/as difundir su obra a través de Internet (p. ej.: en archivos telemáticos institucionales o en su página web) antes y durante el proceso de envío, lo cual puede producir intercambios interesantes y aumentar las citas de la obra publicada. (Véase El efecto del acceso abierto).
Resumo
The criminalization of aggression, which is diametrically opposed to the notion of state sovereignty, has remained in a state of suspended animation until recently. Effective starting on July 17, 2018, the International Criminal Court has been empowered to try individuals for the crime of aggression. Although achieving this feat is commendable in itself, there is no denying the fact that the definition adopted under Article 8 bis of the Rome Statute is outmoded. Being a synthesis between the provisions of two outworn documents of the 20th century, namely the Nuremberg Charter (1945), on the one hand, and the United Nations General Assembly Resolution 3314 (XXIX) (1974), on the other, Article 8 bis seems ill-equipped for the purpose of handling new-age challenges brewing in the
21st century. The author has attempted to summarize the evolution of the crime of aggression as a prelude to presenting a case for the need to adopt a far more inclusive definition within the scheme of Article 8 bis, i.e. taking into consideration the exigencies of the 21st century emanating from (a)
non-traditional means of warfare, such as cyberwarfare; (b) non-state entities, such as terrorist groups; and (c) internal acts of aggression.
Referências
Ambos, Kai. The crime of aggression after Kampala, 53 GYIL 463, (2010).
Bachmann, Dov Sascha and Gerhard Kemp, Aggression as 'Organized Hypocrisy' How the War on Terrorism and Hybrid Threats Challenge the Nuremberg Legacy, 30 (1) Windsor Y.B. Access Just. 235, (2011). http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1871912
Bantekas, Illias. International Criminal Law, 4th ed. (Oxford and Portland, Oregon: Hart Publishing, 2010).
Cassese, Antonio. International Criminal Law, 2nd ed. (Oxford, 2008).
Control Council for Germany, Control Council law no. 10 (1945).
Diplomatic conference of plenipotentiaries on the establishment of an international criminal court, Rome (June 16, 1998).
Draft resolution of the Assembly of States Parties on the continuity of work in respect of the crime of aggression, United Nations (2002). https://documents-dds-ny.un.org/doc/UNDOC/LTD/N02/472/04/PDF/N0247204.pdf?OpenElement
Ferencz, B. Benjamin. Can Aggression Be Deterred by Law, 11 Pace Intl L. Rev. 341, (1999).
International Criminal Court, Assembly activates courts jurisdiction over crime of aggression, International Criminal Court (Press release, Dec. 15, 2017). https://www.icc-cpi.int/Pages/item.aspx?name=pr1350
International Military Tribunal for the Far East, charter (19th Jan 1946). http://www.un.org/en/genocideprevention/documents/atrocitycrimes/Doc.3_1946%20Tokyo%20Charter.pdf
Kittichaisaree, Kriangsak. International Criminal Law, 1st ed. (Oxford University Press, 2001).
McGuinness, Damien. How a cyber attack transformed Estonia, BBC, (Apr. 27, 2017). https://www.bbc.com/news/39655415
Preparatory Commission for the International Criminal Court, United Nations. http://legal.un.org/icc/prepcomm/prepfra.htm
Resolution ICC-ASP/8/Res.6, International Criminal Court (2009), https://asp.icc-cpi.int/iccdocs/asp_docs/Resolutions/ICC-ASP-8-Res.6-ENG.pdf
Resolution RC/Res.6, United Nations (2010). https://treaties.un.org/doc/source/docs/RC-Res.6-ENG.pdf
Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, July 17, 1998, 2187 U.N.T.S. 90 (entered into force July 1, 2002).
Scheffer, David. The Missing Pieces in Article 8 bis (Aggression) of the Rome Statute, 58 Harv. Int'l L.J. 83, (2017). http://www.harvardilj.org/2017/04/the-missing-pieces-in-article-8-bis-aggression-of-the-rome-statute/
Statute of the International Military Tribunal (8 Aug. 1945, 82 UNTS (1951), 280).
The United States of America vs. Wilhelm von Leeb et al, US Military Tribunal Nuremberg, (1948).
The Prosecutor v. Omar Hassan Ahmad Al Bashir, ICC-02/05-01/09. https://www.icc-cpi.int/darfur/albashir
Trial of the Major War Criminals, International Military Tribunal, Nuremberg (Vol. 1, 1947). https://www.loc.gov/rr/frd/Military_Law/pdf/NT_Vol-I.pdf
United Nations General Assembly, Resolution.3314 (XXIX) Definition of Aggression, United Nations (Dec. 14, 1974), http://www.un-documents.net/a29r3314.htm
Werle, Gerhard and Florian Jessberger, Principles of International Criminal Law, 3rd ed. (Oxford University Press, 2014).
##submission.citations.for##
